HELLO TALKRADIOREVIEW.COM READERS

Talkradioreview.com has recently lost its web host and is now a discontinued blog.

Talkradioreview.com readers have been referred to this blog.

Welcome to you all.

Watch for important news regarding THIS blog in the near future.

We are not happy with the performance of Michael Savage in recent months. In fact we are unhappy enough to possibly discontinuing this blog that includes Savage's name and to transfer everything over to a new blog with a new name.

If we make such a move we will let you know.

OBAMA AND KFC

At this point in time it is safe to say that a taxpayer voting for Obama would be the same as a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders.

OBAMA MISSES THE POINT

The Philadelphia speech of Barak Obama shows the black liberal to be one who misses the point entirely.

We do not care if his much admired Pastor Wright is black or white. It is the content of Pastor Wright's sermons that is up for debate here.

Whether you are eskimo, Chinese, Korean, Apache, Russian or Argentinian, if you say the things that Pastor Wright says about America, then you stand ready to be condemned by those who love America.

No, Senator Obama, the point is not that Pastor Wright shares the so-called black experience with you. The point is we do not share the hatred of Pastor Wright. And neither should a presidential candidate.

Senator Obama, we think you are a manipulative phoney. You love Pastor Wright because you buy most of what he says and supports.

We do not want you, Senator Obama. We do not need you, and above all, black voters do not need you.

We are not guilty of racism, Senator Obama. You are. And you have now clearly defined yourself as the racist candidate for president.

RUSH LIMBAUGH GEM

During his Wednesday show, Rush Limbaugh delivered what has to be one of his best recent gems:

Said Limbaugh, "The more people there are out there sitting on their ass waiting for the check to arrive in the mail, the more Democrats like it".

Enough said.

DEMOCRAT PARTY CONTROL

Just who DOES control the Democratic party AND the media?

If the readers will recall: Just a short time ago news broke that Hillary and Obama had engaged in a racial/gender shouting match. The story was covered for all of one or two days.

Can you picture the extensive fallout by the media if a Republican had been involved?

Can you picture the irritants Jackson and Sharpton mounting the podium for days on end, all with never-ending media coverage?

Can you imagine the burning cities and (if possible) bras (or jockstraps) by outraged feminists and people of color, all, of course, amply covered by our media?

Recall, if you will, the months of coverage and righteous harangues and symbolic lynchings by Jackson, Sharpton and the feminazis over those three Duke University students, all, of course, well publicized by our beloved media.

But what happened here? All was quiet after one or two days with love and kisses for all. The media went silent. Jackson and Sharpton remained mum. Cities survived. Feminists kept quiet if possible.

So what orchestrated this 'tolerance'?

Consider the possibility of one in far greater control than Hillary, Obama or the usual operatives, one who read the riot act over dissention jeopardizing this upcoming election in the incessant quest for power and control.

Would it be any one person? Would it be any group, bent on destruction of the principles which founded this Nation or any person backing such a group?

Just consider what has gone on in the past, from the dispersal of untold resources, either in warlike acts, movies and rumors bordering on near sedition with little or no basis, and just consider.

Far more is at stake than a mere election, dear reader. And those that would dismiss this as mere ranting are just as effective an operative as those who have so aptly contributed to what has gone before.

*The parent blog of this blog is found at talkradioreview.com

CIVIL WAR II

At the time of this writing, the New Hampshire primary is underway.

The results of this primary and those that closely follow in the next three months will begin to more clearly define the allegiance that various political figures embrace.

Keep in mind that Talk Radio Review announced months ago that U.S. Civil War II was underway. No, it is not a shooting war at present. But the war is raging in initial stages. It is impossible to tell if a shooting war will develop as it did in Civil War I back in 1861.

Whether it comes to a shooting war or not will greatly depend upon whether or not Marxist and International Socialists advance to the forefront as a result of the 2008 presidential and congressional elections. If the socialist enemies of the Republic make gains, a shooting war will not be far away.

If loyalists gain control of Congress and if a loyalist enters the White House, it may be possible to quell the rising tide of Marxist and Islamic enemies.

In the coming months Talk Radio Review hopes to present brief but relevant commentary on things as they develop in the war. We hope you will return for our commentary. We encourage you to leave your comments as well.

By the way, a new and passionate group of writers will be on board with Talk Radio review.

*The parent blog of this blog is found at talkradioreview.com

PELOSI'S HOPED-FOR WAR

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has pushed a resolution in Congress censuring Turkey for a massacre of Armenians in 1915, while Turkey was part of the former Ottoman Empire.

Turkey has withdrawn diplomatic representatives from the U.S. as a result of Pelosi's Congressional action. A worsening of relations with Turkey could result in termination of the flow of supplies to U.S. troops in Iraq, as U.S. supply aircraft now use Turkish air space.

In addition, Turkey is now threatening to send troops into northern Iraq to disrupt the rise of democracy and economic advances in Iraq's Kurdish territory.

All of these would seriously damage U.S. success in Iraq. They would make it more likely that the U.S. mission in Iraq would fail.

At this particular point in time, why would Nancy Pelosi want to do anything that could seriously affect the U.S. military mission in Iraq.

The answer is that Nancy Pelosi is a Communist, and her agenda is that of international socialism and Marxism. Few will label her accurately as we do here. Some of the best in talk radio, notably Limbaugh and Levin, have come close to applying the proper label to her and the rest of her anti-capitalist, anti-American, anti-Bush socialist Democrats.

This is a civil war, dear readers. There is no shooting yet, but the opening episodes are underway. International socialism and Marxism are making an historical push to destroy the United States as we now know it.

Pelosi's hoped-for war between Turkey and Iraq is just one small part of the Marxist rat pack's efforts.